Most universities prepare students for a career. The University for Peace, or UPEACE, was set up to prepare them for something larger: the difficult, long-term work of building a more peaceful world. It is one of the few academic institutions on the planet created not by a government or a private trust, but by a vote of the United Nations General Assembly. Located in the forests of Costa Rica, it has spent more than four decades training people who go on to work in diplomacy, human rights, development, and conflict resolution. For anyone studying global peace movements, UPEACE is a fascinating case of an idea, peace through education, being turned into a permanent institution.
Table of Contents
- A university born from a UN resolution
- Why Costa Rica?
- The mission and mandate
- What UPEACE actually teaches
- Peace and conflict studies
- International law and human rights
- Environment, development and sustainability
- Gender and peacebuilding
- A different kind of campus
- A global network of peace advocates
- Regional reach beyond Costa Rica
- UPEACE and the wider United Nations system
- Why it matters for students of political science
A university born from a UN resolution
UPEACE is not affiliated with the United Nations by chance. It was deliberately created by it. On 5 December 1980, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 35/55, which set out an International Agreement for the Establishment of the University for Peace, with the University’s own Charter forming part of that agreement. This makes UPEACE a treaty organisation rather than an ordinary college. It runs under its own charter, enjoys academic and financial autonomy, and answers to an international governing council rather than to a single nation’s education ministry.
The push for such a university came from a single determined leader. Rodrigo Carazo Odio, then the President of Costa Rica, proposed the idea to the UN in the late 1970s. The proposal moved through the General Assembly and became reality within a few years. Over time, more than forty countries signed on as parties to the UPEACE Charter, giving the institution genuinely international backing.
Why Costa Rica?
The choice of Costa Rica was symbolic and practical. The country has a long history of favouring peace over force. It abolished its army in 1948 and has consistently invested in education and diplomacy instead of military spending. Hosting a university dedicated to peace fit naturally with that national identity. The Costa Rican state donated 303 hectares of land in El Rodeo, near the town of Ciudad Colón, for the main campus, which is named the Rodrigo Carazo Campus after its founder. So the institution sits, quite literally, on land given for the cause of peace.
The mission and mandate
The Charter gives UPEACE a clear job. Its mission is to provide humanity with an international institution of higher education for peace, and to promote understanding, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence among all people while helping reduce the threats to world peace and progress. In other words, UPEACE exists to attack the roots of conflict, ignorance, prejudice, and misunderstanding, through teaching and research rather than through politics or force.
This mandate has stayed remarkably stable. A 2024 report to the General Assembly described UPEACE as an institution established by a multilateral treaty with both academic and financial autonomy, still committed to advancing education and research that promote sustainable peace and conflict resolution worldwide. When the UN’s Fourth Committee revisited the University in 2024, Costa Rica’s representative described it as a centre of excellence that has trained generations of professionals dedicated to preventing and resolving conflict. The point is that the world body still sees value in an institution whose only product is peace educators.
What UPEACE actually teaches
UPEACE is a graduate institution. It does not run undergraduate degrees; instead it offers master’s and doctoral programmes, plus shorter executive courses. Most students complete an intensive master’s programme structured around short, focused courses rather than long semesters of lectures. Each year it draws a small but global student body, typically a few hundred students from dozens of countries, which means classmates often come from places that have experienced very different kinds of conflict. That diversity is itself part of the education.
The teaching is deliberately interdisciplinary. Programmes pull together political science, law, economics, sociology, and environmental studies so that students learn to see conflict from several angles at once. Below are the broad areas the University covers.
Peace and conflict studies
This is the academic heart of UPEACE. Programmes in international peace studies and related fields teach students how conflicts begin, how they escalate, and how they can be transformed without violence. Students learn negotiation, mediation, peacebuilding, and post-conflict reconstruction. The aim is not just to analyse war from a distance but to build practical skills for working in tense, real-world situations.
International law and human rights
Law is one of the strongest pillars. The master’s in international law and human rights moves students through public international law, human rights law, humanitarian law, and the law of armed conflict. Students then specialise in protecting vulnerable groups such as refugees, indigenous peoples, and human rights defenders, and learn how to monitor abuses and use regional human rights systems. Many graduates go on to work with courts, tribunals, and rights organisations.
Environment, development and sustainability
UPEACE treats environmental stress and unequal development as causes of conflict, not separate issues. Its programmes connect climate change, resource scarcity, and economic exclusion to instability and violence. The University even hosts the Earth Charter Center for Education for Sustainable Development, which runs courses on bringing sustainability values into decision-making and education. This reflects a modern understanding of peace as something that depends on a healthy planet and fair economies.
Gender and peacebuilding
Gender runs through much of the curriculum. The University recognises that women and men experience conflict differently and that lasting peace requires their equal participation. Dedicated programmes examine how gender shapes violence, peace negotiations, and peacekeeping, training students to make peacebuilding more inclusive.
A different kind of campus
Where UPEACE teaches is almost as deliberate as what it teaches. The campus sits inside a large nature reserve that protects a section of original forest, surrounded by greenery rather than concrete. Studying peace in a place that embodies environmental care reinforces the institution’s message that peace, sustainability, and respect for nature are connected. Teaching is conducted in English, which makes the campus accessible to students from around the world without requiring fluency in Spanish.
A global network of peace advocates
One of the most important things UPEACE produces is not degrees but alumni. Over its lifetime, the University has trained thousands of graduates from more than 120 countries. These graduates spread out into the UN system, international NGOs, government ministries, universities, courts, and grassroots organisations. Because they share a common training in peace and conflict, they form an informal worldwide network of people who think in terms of dialogue, rights, and prevention rather than confrontation.
This network effect is exactly what the institution was designed to create. A single person trained in mediation can defuse one dispute; thousands of such people, placed in influential positions across continents, can shift how the world handles conflict over the long run. This is the slow, structural contribution that peace education makes, and it is hard to measure but real.
Regional reach beyond Costa Rica
UPEACE is not confined to its Costa Rican campus. It runs a significant Africa Programme that partners with universities across the continent to offer degrees and short courses in conflict resolution, governance, and international law, building local capacity for peacebuilding. It also maintains offices and partnerships in other regions, including a presence in Europe. This regional model lets the University tailor its work to the specific conflicts and needs of different parts of the world.
UPEACE and the wider United Nations system
Although UPEACE is autonomous, it works closely with the UN family. In 2008 the General Assembly granted the University observer status, allowing it to take part in Assembly sessions as an observer, and it keeps a permanent office at UN headquarters in New York. The UN has also asked its Secretary-General to draw on the University’s expertise in conflict-resolution and peacebuilding efforts.
The University collaborates with other UN bodies on joint programmes too. For example, it partners with the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) to deliver master’s degrees in subjects such as development, diplomacy, and international law in flexible online and hybrid formats. These partnerships extend UPEACE’s reach far beyond what a small campus could achieve alone, and they tie its academic work directly to the practical goals of the international system.
Why it matters for students of political science
For students of global peace movements, UPEACE is a useful example of how an abstract value can be institutionalised. It shows that the international community decided peace was important enough to deserve its own university, complete with a treaty, a charter, and a permanent home. It also illustrates a particular theory of change: that conflict is reduced not only through treaties and peacekeepers but through educating the people who will lead, govern, and negotiate in the future. Whether that approach succeeds is a genuine question worth debating, and UPEACE offers decades of evidence to examine on both sides.
What do you think? Can educating future leaders really reduce conflict in the long run, or does lasting peace depend more on political and economic power than on classrooms? And if a country were to invest heavily in peace education today, what subjects do you think would matter most for the conflicts of the coming decades?
References
- https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/25747?ln=en
- https://www.un.org/en/node/102620
- https://press.un.org/en/2024/gaspd812.doc.htm
- https://www.upeace.org/programmes/gender-and-peacebuilding
- https://www.upeace.org/programmes/international-law-and-human-rights
- https://upeace.org/history/
- https://unitar.org/about/news-stories/press/upeace-unitar-launch-new-masters-degrees-and-certificate-programmes
Leave a Reply